A Faithful Response to Disagreement

In the peer disagreement debate, three intuitively attractive claims seem to conflict: there is among peers on many important matters; a serious challenge one's own opinion; and yet one should be able maintain opinion matters. This article shows that contrary initial appearances, we can accept all of these claims. Disagreement significantly shifts balance evidence; but with respect certain kinds claims, nonetheless retain beliefs. And them even though beliefs would not supported by new total evidence if didn't already hold them.